Sunday, March 17, 2013

The Fact of the Matter

  I've noticed a lot of people lately who are ranting about the "truth". And some who are upset because some of us don't "believe" in the "truth". And the truth they speak of is of a wide range from GMO corn to politics.

  I submit the following based on obsevation. We tend to confuse truth with fact. "What's the dif?" you ask. Glad you asked.

  "Truth" is always based on a belief. "Belief" is accepting as fact, something for which there is no empirical evidence. Here's an example:

 Let's say you find yourself in court. You are charged with armed robbery and murdering the clerk in a small strip mall store. Fact: You did not do it. You do however match the description given by Mrs. Armstrong, the only living witness, who saw the guilty party leave the store and throw the weapon down the storm sewer.

 After taking an oath to tell the truth, and being advised of the penalty for purgery, Mrs. Armstrong takes the witness stand and tells the story of how, as she waited in the car for Mr. Armstrong to get his haircut, she saw  a person fitting your desciption leave the store in a hurry, throw what appeared to be a small caliber revolver into the storm drain, and disappear down an alley. When asked by the prosicuter if that person is in the courtroom, she points her finger at you and says you're the one she saw.

  Suddenly, a police officer enters the courtroom and hurries to your attorney. He whispers to your attorney, waving a large manilla envelope.
  "Your Honor! We have new evidence!" The judge motions to the officer to approace the bench. Your attorney informs you that they finally recovered the weapon and got fingerprints which lead to the arrest of Mortimer Badapple, a guy with a criminal past. Upon opening the envelope, the judge finds an 8X10 photo of Mortimer Badapple. He could be your twin! Charges are dropped and you're released.

Question: Did Mrs. Armstrong tell the truth?
Answer: Yes.
  While is was not you that she saw, she "believed" it was you . Her testamony was true, based on that belief. She did not lie.

  With Mrs. Armstrong's testamony in mind, let's be careful in our conversation to seperate truth from fact.  The two words are not synonyms.

That's a fact.

Peace,
       George.


Friday, March 8, 2013

My Almighty Toaster

I want to preface this post with the following:
   I am not a believer. An atheist if you please, although that term really only describes what I am not. Further, I was, at one time, an evangelical Christian. I was a member of a church that emphasized Bible study. I attended both Sunday services, the mid-week service, the Thusday evening Bible study, and was on the evangelical committee.  I owned a Schofield Study Bible, Strongs Concordenance, Greek interlinear, and other study books. I have not only read, but studied the Bible from cover to cover. I was asked to serve as a Deacon. I lead youth talks and lead a Bible class for pre-schoolers. I spoke from the pulpit. I am not an ignorant atheist. I find I know far more about the Bible than 99% of the Christian people I meet. (But that's a whole other post)

I posted a picture on my Facebook wall the other day. I had been reading some disturbing articles and frankly, posted way more atheistic stuff than normal. I was kind of on a rant. I usually try to post things that are intended to be educational or thought provoking, without jabbing religious folks for the sake of jabbing.

  This particular picture was a drawing, cartoonish, of a cross with a child nailed to it in Christ-like fashion. Beside the drawing was a quote from Tracie Harris of the Atheist Experience. It read:

"You either have a god who sends child rapists to rape children, or you have a god who simply watches and says, 'When you're done, I'll punish you.'
 "If I could stop a person from raping a child, I would. That's the difference between me and your god"

A good friend, and one of my favorite people, commented:
"I have a God that says it's up to us. Watch over the children and punish the rapist, any Rapist."

My final comment was, "That's like saying, 'I have a toaster that says it's up to you, watch over the children etc."
It really is the same. My Toaster actually has all of the qualities of that god. I can say, "My toaster has a plan for me. If I trust, my Toaster will provide. I can pray to my toaster, and when the desired result happens, rejoice and praise it. If I do not get the desired result, it was not my Toasters will. But I can be assured that my Toaster will never give me more than I can bear. Plus I can put a slice of ordiary bread in my Toaster and right before my eyes it will become delicious, warm, golden, toast.

If you are a believer and you've made it this far, you now are begining to know what it's like to be an a-theist. Someone is going on about some ridiculous crap about a miraculous (Toaster/God).

You may say, "Your Toaster in man made". Do I have to say it?
I don't know how many toasters man has created, but since the Sumarians developed a written language, something like 6000 years ago, man has documented 2870 Deities. Many are still familiar. Thor, Odin, Zues, Neptune, Oris, Aphrodite, Rah. All were once great and powerful gods.

The earliest gods were sort of like the God of genesis. They explained the unexplainable. The sun moving across this flat table-top-like earth. Lightning. Fire. All these things that were beyond human comprehension. Later, people went "up" to Heaven, or "down" to Hell. This was possible on the  table-top flat Earth, with heaven above and Hell below.

Of course now we know that the Earth is a Spherical planet, rotating on a polar axis while orbiting a sun that is hurling through space. If one were to ascend from the surface of the planet one would go "out there, somewhere, depending on the position of the planet etc."
  There is no "up" from earth, only "out."  So heaven would have to be a reletively small place, in
 geo-sincronous orbit with a particular lift off point.

Some gods died with thier followers. Others fell victim to critical thinking. Then came science. Astronomers tracked the movement of the stars. Mariners tested the "edge". Bad news for gods.
  But there were a handful that hung on. The major players, with one notable exception, had a trump card that has kept them alive. The "No Death Guarantee." Bam! Whether it's Nervana, Re-incarnation, Paradise, Heaven, you just can't beat not dying.
  My Toaster did come with a guarantee, but nothing like that.

The notable exception? Judaism. I will be the first to admit I know little about the Torah, and how it may differ from the "Old Testament" Genesis-Deuteronomy, But I do know the Old Testament Yahweh gave no such guarantee. Death was punishment.

Getting back to my Almighty Toaster, you can plainly see, like it or not, that it has most of the same ridiculous qualities of the average god.
  It seems harmless enough, unless my Toaster acquires a following who wants to come into your children's school and teach your kids all about the power and glory of my Toaster and present it to them as a fact, like "The Good News Club". Or deny Gay people the right to eat toast like the rest of us.  Or they imprison and torture non-Toaster believers, Or they declare holy war on non-toasterites. Or fly planes into buildings full of Toasterless infidels.


  Sadly, because of the lack of a "No Death Guarantee," I suspect that sooner or later my glorious Toaster will end up where all gods belong, and where they can do no harm.